Let’s first briefly extract the master’s views:

　　1: Hydrogen energy will have disruptive applications in mobile power generation and transportation energy application scenarios such as cars and airplanes.

　　2: After mastering the rules of applying hydrogen energy, hydrogen energy is safe enough. Safer than gasoline.

　　Low temperature lithium iron phosphate battery 3.2V 20A -20℃ charging, -40℃ 3C discharge capacity ≥70%

　　Charging temperature: -20~45℃ -Discharge temperature: -40~+55℃ -40℃ Support maximum discharge rate: 3C -40℃ 3C discharge capacity retention rate ≥70%

　　Click for details

　　3: The smog problem can be solved by establishing a hydrogen energy utilization system.

　　4: Hydrogen energy is in its early stages in the United States, Japan, and South Korea. Although hydrogen energy accounts for less than one ten thousandth of the energy in these countries, "technical masters" believe that the utilization of hydrogen energy in these countries is advanced and has made great progress. contribute. China attaches great importance to the national strategy, implements it at the local level, and is full of enthusiasm.

　　5: How can my country’s hydrogen energy industry make breakthroughs? A. Promote the development of the entire hydrogen energy industry chain and lay out hydrogen energy industry demonstration zones. B. Establish a major national project on hydrogen energy and create an era of hydrogen energy heavy trucks. C. Make full use of waste electricity to reduce hydrogen production costs.

　　Hydrogen energy is the safest, safer than gasoline. This is like saying that hydrogen bombs kill people with less pain than bullet belts and are more humane. Because the explosion of the hydrogen bomb was almost instantaneous, the pain was gone before it reached the brain. Hydrogen catches fire more easily than gasoline, and the fire spreads more severely. Once hydrogen gas leaks, it will definitely cause combustion or explosion. If gasoline leaks in a collision, it may not catch fire. "Technology masters" regard this as the best advantage, so confusing right and wrong? Is this an advertisement for those who benefit from the development of hydrogen energy?

　　This science and technology official's suggestions on how to develop hydrogen energy are pertinent, measured and reasonable.

　　However, we should not vigorously promote hydrogen energy. Hydrogen energy will only be used as a supplementary energy source in the future, not the main energy source.

　　Current media reports and the views of some scientists regard hydrogen energy as the future energy, or even the only clean energy in the future. This is a very wrong idea and understanding. Although there were many voices of opposition, they were drowned out by the fanaticism that had lost rational thinking.

　　What if you break out of this fake trend of following others' opinions?

　　The first thing is to understand clearly, what do we need in the future? What we need is energy. Such as electricity, oil and coal and other forms of energy. And electricity is the best form of energy. If there is enough electricity, why hydrogen?

　　Secondly, think clearly, where does the energy come from? According to the 2018 BP Energy Yearbook, at the current consumption rate of proven oil, gas and coal reserves, oil reserves are only enough for 50 years, natural gas for 50.2 years, and coal for 134 years. When oil and natural gas are exhausted after 50, the consumption rate of coal will intensify. That is, if there are no more commercially exploited proven reserves. The fossil energy industry will disappear within a hundred years. In the future, our only sources of energy will be solar energy, nuclear energy and geothermal energy.

　　If you want to understand these two points, you will find that hydrogen energy is a picked-up child among future energy sources. Hydrogen energy, like electricity, is a secondary energy source. Currently, most energy sources are already electrified. When the electrification of transportation vehicles is completed, electric energy will be the main secondary energy source in the future. The proportion of hydrogen energy will be very low. The reason why hydrogen energy is needed is because the storage of electrical energy is a headache.

　　Currently, photovoltaic power generation accounts for less than 1%, but it is foreseeable that photovoltaic power generation will replace thermal power in the next 30 years. The cost per kilowatt-hour of photovoltaic power generation is lower than that of thermal power, but without sunlight, there is no electricity, and electric energy needs to be stored. If photovoltaic power generation accounts for more than 75%. Then hydropower and nuclear power will not be able to bear the burden of energy storage and load adjustment. Therefore, the broad view now is to enable hydrogen energy storage.

　　According to the views of "tech gurus" and some people, the electric energy is used to hydrolyze hydrogen, then be stored, and then use fuel cells to generate electricity. There are actually two sources of hydrogen. One is to break C-H bonds, mainly extracted from hydrocarbon materials (petroleum, natural gas, biomass, etc.), and the other is to produce hydrogen from the break of O-H bonds, mainly water decomposition and electrolysis. Water splitting to produce hydrogen is the most direct method, but research shows that it requires a temperature above 2500K for water decomposition to be obvious. Considering the high temperature resistance of materials and the limitations of hydrogen and oxygen separation technology, direct water decomposition is currently technically unfeasible. Electrolysis is a more feasible method. Of course, there are more than 300 ways to produce solar chemical hydrogen. Both obtain hydrogen, which is either inefficient as a storage energy medium.

　　The current large-scale, industrialized high-temperature electrolysis hydrogen production efficiency is 75%, and the efficiency of the American General Company's SPE method is even as high as 90%. Hydrogen fuel cells theoretically achieve over 90% efficiency. It's actually between 60 and 80%. In other words, if hydrogen energy is used as energy storage, the maximum theoretical efficiency may reach 80%, and the current best technical efficiency is typically about 45%. Put aside expensive electrolysis equipment, hydrogen fuel cells and energy storage devices. This efficiency should not be low.

　　In this system, solar energy has been effectively stored in the process of concentrating photothermal energy to produce carbon monoxide. Can solve the power needs at night. The process of producing carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide also stores some of the solar energy. It can then be converted into media such as dimethyl ether and methanol that can be stored for a long time, and the storage equipment requirements are lower than those of hydrogen.

　　What is the highest efficiency of such a system? There is currently no engineering data. According to the annual efficiency of solar thermal power generation, which can be as high as 19%, solar thermal energy storage is definitely better than hydrogen energy, and dimethyl ether and methanol are also better than hydrogen energy in mobile energy sources. (For related discussions, see the author’s relevant articles).

　　Based on the above reasons, if we blindly emphasize promoting hydrogen energy without considering the development of other forms of energy. It is likely to delay the future energy transition. Moreover, the main energy source in the future is electricity, followed by storable renewable energy (such as solar heat, hydropower, biomass), then renewable secondary energy such as dimethyl ether and methanol, and finally expensive hydrogen energy. Please immediately stop using taxpayer dollars to subsidize hydrogen energy that has no technical advantages in the first place.

Read recommendations:

703048 1100mAh 3.7V

Lithium battery structure and voltage, capacity composition method

The difference between lithium polymer batteries and lithium batteries.solar energy battery storage

AA Ni-MH batteries manufacturer

602535 battery